Issue 28:
Modern Rites of Passage
>Home
>Current Issue
>Rites of Passage
Editorial
Modern Rites of Passage Editorial
By David Harrison
I have to admit that, many months ago when I agreed to
be the editor of this issue of the Journal for Living,
I did so with hesitation and doubt.
This uncertainty was fed by questions like, What do I
know about rites of passage? Or even, What exactly is a
rite of passage? As I began to research and explore for
answers to these questions, and as articles began to
come in from our readers, my doubts at first worsened.
It seemed like everyone else was as confused as I was.
Of course, I had heard and agreed with all the
anecdotal laments over our culture's lack of real
ritual, but no one seemed able to put their finger on
the real problem or the real solution.
Slowly, though, the bedrock for this issue began to
take shape, and some of the other articles gained power
through an evolving context. This emerging clarity
began with the arrival of David Albert's article on
teenagers. Not only did he define rites of passage in
the classical language of the coiners of the phrase,
Arnold van Gennep and Victor Turner (who both stressed
the idea of “liminality,” a phase of in-between-ness
that a rite of passage guides one through), but Albert
also discussed the importance of the ages twelve to
fifteen in the life of every person. This is when our
in-between-ness is at its most extreme, a time ripe
with danger and possibility, trepidation and potential.
Shortly after reading Albert's article, I received an
important lesson from a thirteen-year-old boy in my
class at the Free School. He had joined me to hear a
story from Michael Meade's powerful book, The Water of
Life, which is full of archetypal tales of passage. I
had mentioned nothing of these stories to the boys who
joined me, but before we started this one boy asked,
“Can I tell a story before we start?” I said sure.
Over the next twenty minutes, he told a complex and
powerful tale about two boys, brothers, who go deeper
into the forest than they'd ever gone before. They are
stalked all the while by ominous footsteps, a predation
that grows closer and closer as night falls. When
darkness overtakes the boys, they stop in a clearing,
set up their tent and bed down for the night.
But the footsteps grow closer still, until finally they
are right outside the tent. One of the boys withdraws
his knife, crouches, and springs out into the darkness,
striking at whatever it is that stalks them. After the
long struggle is over and silence returns, the brother
in the tent is summoned, told to bring the flashlight.
He joins his brother in the forested night. The light
is aimed at the motionless body before them, revealing
their stalker, the source of the ominous footsteps. The
boys' father lies dead before them. The end. My
thirteen-year-old student-turned-teacher smiled
proudly.
Not only did this teenager's mythological story presage
perfectly the Meade tale I was just about to read, but
it shed light on so much of what we find in this issue
of JFL. The return to nature. The distancing from
parental protection and constraint (no matter how
well-meaning). The anxiety and fear that accompany
separation.
All this from a boy who had more than likely never even
heard the phrase “rites of passage.” He seemed simply
to possess some in-born awareness and understanding of
what it takes to move forward in this life.
Albert and my student both helped me discover one of
the key lessons at the heart of this issue. Even if our
culture, our family, our peers, or our religion no
longer properly ritualize our meaningful passages,
those passages are happening nonetheless, those innate
changes are stored in us waiting for a trigger, and it
is up to us to recognize them, and honor them in our
own way, on our own if necessary.
The next bedrock piece arrived in Maggie Sebastian's
article about dying. She moves us from Albert's focus
on youth to the reality of death, forcing us to face
the one passage none of us can avoid. Sebastian further
draws upon the seminal work of van Gennep and Turner,
laying out the three stages of a rite of passage:
separation from your old status; transition; and
incorporation into your new status. And then she
demands of us, and shows us how, to take back our rites
of passage, how to recognize their importance and
reclaim them as our own.
Finally, there is our interview with Joanne Lauck. On
the surface this interview about the insect world may
seem incongruous with the theme of rites of passage,
but it doesn't take long to realize that Lauck is
providing us with rare and valuable insights on the
subject. She shows us that the natural world plays a
vital role in our movement through life, and that our
growing disconnection from nature is stunting our own
growth as individuals and as a culture.
The natural world is coded with meaning, Lauck insists,
and these meanings often come to us via messengers like
insects, and help trigger our transitions and guide us
to the next phase of life.
Within the context of Albert, Sebastian and Lauck, the
other articles take on their full meaning and shape.
Katherine Michalak's article on shifting family
dynamics becomes a story of finding one's own true
identity. Meisha Rosenberg's story of canoeing portrays
a powerful reconnection with nature and her father.
Utah Phillips‚ spoken-word reminiscence demonstrates
one man's way of separating himself from societal
injustice.
By the time you have finished reading this issue, you
will have read stories of passage that take place in
homes, in the woods, on battlefields, in classrooms, on
sports fields, in city parking lots; they will all
involve the discovery of hidden talents, hidden loves
and hidden lives.
And finally, when you read Chris Mercogliano's history
of JFL (coming to our home page), the rites of passage
will involve even the end of an era for this very
magazine. We will no longer be publishing JFL on paper;
this is our first web-only edition. We're not sure what
the future holds for us, but we know it will be
profoundly different from the past. In van Gennep's and
Turner's lingo, we are in the transition of liminality.
We are all in mourning over the loss of old status, the
passing of a cherished labor of love. But we are also
relieved to be moving on, to be on the lookout for new
possibilities and new opportunities, for incorporation
into a newfound status.
We hope you enjoy this last issue, and we encourage you
to keep checking in at our website for updates,
expanded access to back issues, and the periodic new
article or interview.
We thank you all again for the support you've given us
on every step of our journey.
Till we meet again,
David Harrison
Top of Page
|